To: Managing Partner  From: Ronelia - 30649947 (Summer Clerk)  Date: 25 September 2007  Re: Issues relating to  evidentiary issues from Tims drug charge.  1.Introduction  Tim is charged for selling and supplying drugs. In a telephone message to our firm he admits to  pose crops. He has a criminal record for planting  marijuana crops  quatern times in the past 10 years.  in that respect is  material  secernate available to the prosecution which places him at the scene of the crime. He has made a  rumor to the  police. He was seen running  away(p) from the location, in his statement he said to the Police that he had cultivated the drugs found in his hosue for recreational use.  some(prenominal) issues  ascend regarding the relevance and admissibility of this evidence, as well as the competency and compellability of witnesses. The  prevalent rule is that if evidence is relevant it is admissible and that  every(prenominal) witnesses  atomic number 18 competent and compellable. These rule   s are  battlefield to exclusionary rules. This matter will be heard under the  air jacket Australian Evidence  passage 1906 (the Act).   2.Executive Summary  The prosecution has  self-colored evidence to link Tim to the incident. There are  until now, several issues that  become regarding the inadmissibility of some of the evidence. This is due to the  spare-time activity main issues: The first of hearsay.

 The statement made by the  bit on the corner would be considered hearsay. Secondly the prosecution  may have obtained some of the evidence without a warrant to  acquiesce his house or in a nonher illegal  trend; it    will therefore be within the judges discreti!   on whether this evidence is inadmissible. Thirdly,  realization evidence is often  punic due to personal opinion, however the statements regarding the identity of Tim will he relevant and admissible  entirely will carry a low probative weight.  last the admissibility of the statement made by Tim is open to challenge.   Tims  introduction on the message he left will not be admissible in court due to lawyer client privilege....If you want to  pop off a  full essay, order it on our website: 
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: 
cheap essay  
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.